5
« Last post by vtsteam on April 27, 2025, 10:10:29 PM »
The large hole shape in the casting would have been bored out for a press fit on a cast iron cylinder. A facing plate would have sealed off the chamber which would contain water for cooling.
While the casting turned out great, I've already changed my mind about the design specifics, so this one probably will be remelted to cast a somewhat different configuration. It was mainly cast as a test piece to prove out the foam construction method, and the adhesive (Borden's Rubber cement) which I've used many times in building model airplanes.
I just have to draw the new design up, and try again -- with the recent experience of this one under my belt. I'm very glad it came out right the first time, and there's very little I'd change about the method used.
This part also could have been cast from a conventional wooden pattern in greensand with a core piece for the bore hole. The sides would have needed a little draft and therefore a machining allowance. but for something this small, that doesn't really amount to much metal loss. There are no undercuts so it wasn't essential to do it in lost foam.