Gallery, Projects and General > Project Logs
Radial 3-cylinder steam project
<< < (3/4) > >>
BillTodd:
Is there any reason why you cannot off-set the cylinders by the width of the big-end? - It would mean all the con-rods could be identical and simpler to construct.

Bill
Kjetil:

--- Quote from: BillTodd on May 09, 2012, 10:41:43 AM ---Is there any reason why you cannot off-set the cylinders by the width of the big-end? - It would mean all the con-rods could be identical and simpler to construct.

Bill

--- End quote ---

Nope, no reason whatsoever, it's probably the way to go. Just had to skim through the options first. Think it'll actually be easier to balance properly too, with all rods being identical.
PekkaNF:

--- Quote from: Kjetil on May 09, 2012, 09:22:49 AM ---I attached a visualization of the forked crank. It doesn't look all that bad, the worry is ofcourse the outter fork.

--- End quote ---

Is there a reason why do you must place the fork/blade such that one will span the whole distance on the crank pin? If you allow a little offset or cylinder and do all con-rods forked and anly middle one a little wider fork? Should probably C-O-C one, because I'm not sure if my explanation does any good.

PekkaNF
Kjetil:
I understand the suggestion Pekka, and it would perhaps be a better choice than the setup I sketched, but I think my mind is settled now, on plain conrods and cylinder offset. Just makes the most sense.  :beer:
Kjetil:
So, the crank casing got a bit deeper, so did the balancing eccentrics, but crank casing width/height could be reduced some without the crank arms colliding with the cylinder wall, and I was able to also shave some millimetres off the crank arm length due to the reduced size of the crank mechanism.

From a cosmetic point of view, a cylinder exterior like this one would even hide the cylinder offset from eye. Just a thought.

But the more I read on the topic of crank arms, the more confident I get that this is the best solution for me;
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version