Gallery, Projects and General > How do I?? |
split cotter dimensions |
<< < (3/3) |
russ57:
:) :nrocks: I think you are suggesting that perhaps a cotter of 6061 may clamp better than steel, against a steel shaft, and that the fit of the shaft against the cotter is important. Discussions elsewhere suggest even a notch cut in the cotter, rather than a milled crescent works fine. More Experiment required! Thanks, I'll be back! |
Lew_Merrick_PE:
--- Quote from: russ57 on March 28, 2012, 09:13:35 PM ---I think you are suggesting that perhaps a cotter of 6061 may clamp better than steel, against a steel shaft, and that the fit of the shaft against the cotter is important. Discussions elsewhere suggest even a notch cut in the cotter, rather than a milled crescent works fine. --- End quote --- Russ, It is less that I am suggesting using 6061 aluminum than it is that I am suggesting that you think about the variables affecting your work. It is true that using a higher friction material (such as 606xx aluminum) can work in your favor (though there are drawbacks in co-machining aluminum and steel), but that is not the only variable. If you make "ramps" (avoiding the general term "notch") in your collet/cotter, you will end up with a wedge-lock device. This may help you in terms of applying a restraining force against rotation, but it also may for you to "rap" the unit to let it go. It will self-unlock so long as the effective angle of contact between the face of the wedge and the cylinder being clamped has a tangent value greater than the coefficient of friction between the two materials. Going from memory (always dangerous at my age), this is generally a wedge angle (with respect to the centerline of the collet/cotter) greater than 18°. One thing to remember about aluminum on steel contact is that aluminum oxidizes into (gee whiz, what a surprise) aluminum oxide -- a very fine abrasive. Aluminum oxide will rather quickly abrade non-hardened steel at rates that often surprises people. One of the, I was a hero (for a day) situations occurred with a company I did work for when I "solved" the problem of their aluminum router "skates" wearing out the CRS sheet "tracks" upon which they slid them. (A UHMW polyethylene "bearing" was the answer.) |
Navigation |
Message Index |
Previous page |