Gallery, Projects and General > How do I??
split cotter dimensions
<< < (3/3)
russ57:


 :) :nrocks:

I think you are suggesting that perhaps a cotter of 6061 may clamp better than steel,  against a steel shaft, and that the fit of the shaft against the cotter is important.
Discussions elsewhere suggest even a notch cut in the cotter,  rather than a milled crescent works fine.

More Experiment required!
Thanks,  I'll be back!


Lew_Merrick_PE:

--- Quote from: russ57 on March 28, 2012, 09:13:35 PM ---I think you are suggesting that perhaps a cotter of 6061 may clamp better than steel,  against a steel shaft, and that the fit of the shaft against the cotter is important.
Discussions elsewhere suggest even a notch cut in the cotter,  rather than a milled crescent works fine.
--- End quote ---
Russ,

It is less that I am suggesting using 6061 aluminum than it is that I am suggesting that you think about the variables affecting your work.  It is true that using a higher friction material (such as 606xx aluminum) can work in your favor (though there are drawbacks in co-machining aluminum and steel), but that is not the only variable.

If you make "ramps" (avoiding the general term "notch") in your collet/cotter, you will end up with a wedge-lock device.  This may help you in terms of applying a restraining force against rotation, but it also may for you to "rap" the unit to let it go.  It will self-unlock so long as the effective angle of contact between the face of the wedge and the cylinder being clamped has a tangent value greater than the coefficient of friction between the two materials.  Going from memory (always dangerous at my age), this is generally a wedge angle (with respect to the centerline of the collet/cotter) greater than 18°.

One thing to remember about aluminum on steel contact is that aluminum oxidizes into (gee whiz, what a surprise) aluminum oxide -- a very fine abrasive.  Aluminum oxide will rather quickly abrade non-hardened steel at rates that often surprises people.  One of the, I was a hero (for a day) situations occurred with a company I did work for when I "solved" the problem of their aluminum router "skates" wearing out the CRS sheet "tracks" upon which they slid them.  (A UHMW polyethylene "bearing" was the answer.)
Navigation
Message Index
Previous page

Go to full version