Author Topic: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.  (Read 17259 times)

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« on: January 01, 2012, 05:01:09 PM »
Using a DCMT11T3 carbide tip on a right hand turning tool. I get like a fine groove or more like extremly fine thread.
I have tried different materials cast iron rod and aluminium rod - and the result is the same.





These two items are photographed with a macro, and the larger one is about 15mm in diameter and maybe around 20mm in height.
The thread is extremly small you can feel it and see it but not enough that a nail would catch onto the groove.

I guess this must be something wrong with my setup, speed / feed / angle of tool?!
Tried to find some answers by googling this and searching but cannot find out what would make this result.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2012, 08:26:24 PM by Brass_Machine »
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline tomrux

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2012, 05:16:02 PM »
carbide is not the best tool when looking for a fine surface finish. But a lower feed at higher chuck speed may work. Not ideal

HSS real sharp will do better for most steels and anything softer.

Tom R

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2012, 05:32:52 PM »
Oki, i will have to learn how to sharpen hss tools then.. i was hunting that "mirror finish" on aluminium, didnt really workout i guess. ;)

It seemed, it would be better finish the faster i go with carbide tips. But when doing the math, my lathe wont do 3000rpm so.
It will max out at 920rpm and cast iron at 920rpm will be really hot tools even with flooding.

But gonna try that thing with lower feed speeds - just gonna have to figure out how the hell i gonna get my lathe doing that. =)
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline raynerd

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2893
  • Country: gb
    • Raynerds Projects - Raynerd.co.uk
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2012, 05:59:25 PM »
Is it set at the correct height and is there enough clearence at the front? It isn`t marking the surface after it has been cut has it?

For a decent finish on Al the best I can get is with a round nose carbide tipped tool as has been mentioned on these forums many times....unfortunately due to their shape, I find them very limited in what they can be used for!
 
Chris

Offline andyf

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1795
  • Country: gb
    • The Warco WM180 Lathe - Modifications
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2012, 06:54:24 PM »
How big is your lathe? Some say that the lack of rigidity inherent in small lathes can lead to problems with carbide tooling, so well-sharpened HSS is better.  My own experience (which I admit is limited) with my small lathes is better with HSS than carbide.

Andy
Sale, Cheshire
I've cut the end off it twice, but it's still too short

Offline rleete

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: us
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2012, 08:18:02 PM »
Carbide was developed for production shops so that they could take advantage of the greater rigidity and power of modern machinery.  The claim to fame of carbide is the ability to take deeper and faster cuts.  Using it on hobby machines just doesn't make a lot of sense.

Learning to grind your own bits will serve you well.  It's cheaper, you can make custom shaped tools, and you'll never need a special wheel to sharpen bits.  Oh, and you'll probably get a better finish as well.  Here's a link to using a sander to grind bits:  http://www.machinistblog.com/grinding-lathe-tools-on-a-belt-sander/

One last thing.  Search for diamond or tangential tool bits to get a really fins finish cut on almost any metal.  Here's a link to to one:  http://www.machinistblog.com/how-to-grind-and-use-the-contrary-finishing-tool/  They call it the contrary finishing tool, but it's the same concept.
Creating scrap, one part at a time

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2012, 03:26:22 AM »
I am not going to contradict the earlier posters but it is time to add a few words which need to be mentioned.

The first is to mention what we are actually doing with a lathe. We are cutting a thread. Whether we do it under power with a lead or feed screw- we are cutting a thread. If we use a plain lathe i.e. no screws to do the thing, we are still cutting a thread.
If you look at a piece of work- with a decent glass or microscope, you will find that you have cut a thread- no matter what sort of tool is used.
Looking at it carefully, it will have copied the cutting edge of the lathe tool. If you are not happy with the result- and have done all the other adjustments, the faults lie on your tool. If you look at the cutting edge, it will look like a ragged saw and this is what is going to piss you off.
Regrettably, you are going to get someone who is going to tell you an old wives tale about grinding it on a belt sander or a chunk of concrete or what is not much better whirring round on a grinder.
At best, you will be cutting metal better but it will not be mirror finished.  That will only be achieved if you gradually reduce the saw edges from the lathe tool by lapping or honing( call it what you will) with progressively finer grit sizes untill the tool becomes a mirror.

What has not been said is that you are trying with a lathe to do what industry uses 2 tools to do. You cut to say .002" oversize and reduce it to dimension with a cylindrical grinder or other machine.

And if you don't want to go all the way( and most will settle for something less) you will probably dump your carbides, dump your HSS and go back to carbon steel tools which take the best edge of all- easier

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2012, 04:24:04 AM »
I have choosen carbide tips tools for one main reason, they are easy and cheap to replace (the tips that is), buying one piece of halv inch HSS steel for tooling, in sweden costs around 30 dollars, i buy 10 tips for 30 dollars off ebay including shipping. But i hear you, HSS or Carbon steel tools seems to have an advantage in lifetime and the ability to be reshapen to whatever the type of cut i need to make. It could prob. paying off in the longrun going with the HSS tooling bits.

What kinda lathe do i use, its a Optimum 320x920 D a small metric lathe, http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/k%C3%A4llare3.jpg
I dont know how rigid it is it sits on 8 small "shoes" that are supposed to take up alot of the vibrations.

Craynerd, i have been setting the toolheight with the principle of using the dub tip and then taking a surface cut and measuring the knob produced and then adjuster the QCTH until the knob disappears completely. The tool is setup so that the tip of the tool is going 90 degrees with the work i have been wondering if the trailing thread is cut by som material building up on the tool.

And finally Fergus, i get it that there are thread we are cutting always, what seems strange to me is that the "overstep" of the tooltip is so fine that when feed "normally" it will produce a visible thread. I cant run the carriage slower than the chuck on my lathe, so i would make a smaller overstep that way. And i get it that a cutting edge is not smooth, you could probably never get it smooth either with an abrasive method of grinding / sharpening a toolbit or am i wrong here?!
That part about the industry i didnt know about.. So i guess a tool post grinder and a aluminium oxide wheel would probably be the "finishing" touch i'am looking for?!

Thanks all for posting answers, i greatly appreciate all the tips and responses on this forum!  :nrocks:
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2012, 05:06:31 AM »
One piece of hss can be sharpened and sharpened and sharpened. OK, my friend, I have a drawer full of HSS tooling- and I'm not going to get rid of it!  I do have the ability to sharpen and then hone because I tend to ignore the general run of so called advice. Indeed, I am a crusty old man. I do take the advice of writers in the past who have owned and run very successfully several businesses, have gone on to win medals for their supreme skills at model exhibitions and others who have taught the subject over  a lifetime.

I either use a diamond lap or diamond paste-- and I get results-- and save an awful lot of money on E-bay or wherever.

In my garage is a swedish steel tool. It was made before the last war. What's wrong with good Swedish steel?

Regards

Fergus

Offline loply

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 260
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2012, 08:36:30 AM »
Did you say you were turning a 15mm part at 920rpm with carbide tooling?

If so, that's way too slow. I would run that part at the max speed on my lathe, around 1800rpm. And probably faster if I could.

At different times I have had surface finish issues identical to yours, usually the cause has been one of the following:

Insufficient rigidity eg compound slide gib not set tightly enough
Insert is worn and needs replaced or turned around
Spindle speed too low, feed too fast or too slow
Depth of cut too deep for rigidity of part

You will be able to fix this issue, my lathe isn't a scratch on yours and I get near perfect finish on all steels one way or another.

Also, I'm not saying you have this issue, but it can be caused by leadscrew problems eg misaligned or bent leadscrew causing a pulsing feed rather than a smooth feed.



Cheers,
Rich

Offline jiihoo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: fi
  • Finland - Northern Europe
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2012, 09:54:10 AM »
Hi Neo,

Were you using the automatic feed on all attempts? What happens if you feed manually? (try both slow and fast feed; for the slowest feed you might even try using the topslide; that should prevent you from feeding too fast  :thumbup: ).

I have an Optimum D180x300 (way smaller than your lathe, mine is 65 kg and yours should be 410 kg) and I use carbide tools. That shouldn't be the problem in your case.

I looked at the Optimum catalog for you, you should be able to get the spindle up to 1800 rpm (or 2500 if you have the vario model) on the 320. I think you should try that.

Is the lathe new or used?

Offline The Steamer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2012, 01:54:51 PM »
Just a quick note on carbide to, There are hundreds and thousands of differant grades of carbide.

Each grade is specific to ONE machining condition on ONE type of material yet almost every single carbide tip listed on ebay states they are for General maching on steel.

 Ive seen inserts for nylon listed as stainless grade tips, cast iron as steel tips. Unless you have been tought the carbide companies grading system you are buying grades of carbide that are utter usless to you.

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2012, 03:19:00 PM »
Hoorah, Mr Steamer!

Whilst HSS can be of varying grades, none are that critical for the little man with a little lathe.

One of the greatest gurus described his grades as Eclipse Grade H5 and VH. The latter stood for Vacuum Hardened but others took it as Very Hard whilst he used stronger descriptions. I have a few grades which are designed to cut whilst red hot. Of course, I always use lard oil as a lubricant and my workshop is opening as a restaurant later this year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2012, 05:18:37 PM »
Fergus: its nothing wrong with swedish steel.. Just it's overpriced, and hard to comeby outside speciality stores. I have ordered myself a bench grinder today and will try to grind HSS toolbits though. =)

Steamer: I have discovered that.. the ones i have is described as "misc. cutting".. i dont really belive them. ;)

Jiihoo: yes, the machine is completely new.. first thing i had to do was take everything apart clean it, put it together again and tighten exactly everything.. Took about 2 days of measuring (and swearing). I should try that 1800rpm setting. And as you say, feeding manually makes the surface finish more or less mirror like, requires a steady hand though and doing larges parts this way is hard. =D


I got pretty good results today though with a 700rpm setting, and a carriage feed of 0.028mm/revolution.. it took like forever to surface cut a 10cm rod. but it came out not that bad.. So i guess, higher speed is the solution to this tooling thread afterall.
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline DaveH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • Country: za
  • Kempton Park, South Africa
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2012, 06:04:17 PM »
Neo Tech,

"..........................to surface cut a 10cm rod"

I am not too sure I understand.

 :beer:
DaveH



(Ex Leicester, Thurmaston, Ashby De La Zouch.)

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2012, 06:11:42 PM »
DaveH: It's ok, you dont have to.    :thumbup:
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2012, 06:57:45 PM »
I cut steel and ally at lower speeds using carbide tooling sometimes, but I prefer to use HSS mostly. Grind a couple of bits up and pay close attention to the cutting edge. When I first started grinding HSS I would get the shape right but often found that I neglected the very tip that was doing the cutting, and ended-up with negative rake or a rounded tip or something. Now I finish them off with a stone or EZ-lap diamond hone and the difference is astounding.

I was right pleased to find 10 pieces of Stellite 100 last week and only £4 a pop. If you can get hold of this stuff - grab it with both hands.

Offline Pete49

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
  • Country: au
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2012, 10:18:17 PM »
I seem to be repeating what the others have said but I have to agree. when I bought my first metal lathe I went with carbide tools as I had no idea how to sharpen hss and like you was not happy with the finish. Then a friend, a machinist, gave me some hss tools to try and showed me how to sharpen & shape them and hardly ever use carbide tooling now even in my mill/drill. They have their place but as Fergus and others point out mainly in industry. I even went as far as buying a diamond tool holder and have found it to be an asset(http://www.eccentricengineering.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=17)  Unfortunately most sellers of hobby lathes suggest carbide tools but very few sellers have an engineering background so perpetuate the myth about carbide tools being the best. Another problem with some of the cheaper carbide tooling is it can be brittle as well and when I started I had some chipping on me but that could have been inexperience as well.
Saying that I admit to having a set of brazed tip carbide tools that I use for roughing out on unknown (rusty) steel as it saves my good tools  :clap:
Hope this helps
Pete
oops..........oh no.........blast now I need to redo it

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2012, 03:07:22 AM »
I was right pleased to find 10 pieces of Stellite 100 last week and only £4 a pop. If you can get hold of this stuff - grab it with both hands.

Stellite is certainly remarkable stuff and will cut at red hot temperatures.

One of the great- well, he helped to make the Atom bomb, made ball bearings on a riickety lathe( sorry a Drummong) and designed the Quorn used----------------------------------------old worn out files for some jobs.
Clearly, we don't need to buy fancy steels and mine are mainly collected from deceased club members. I'm not sure whether that reads OK but who cares?
I have a set of carbides from buying a little titchy lathe-- but I don't tell people about my inner secrets. Maybe I threw them at the neighbours cats?

Fergus

Offline jiihoo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: fi
  • Finland - Northern Europe
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2012, 04:56:36 AM »

. I should try that 1800rpm setting. And as you say, feeding manually makes the surface finish more or less mirror like, requires a steady hand though and doing larges parts this way is hard. =D

I got pretty good results today though with a 700rpm setting, and a carriage feed of 0.028mm/revolution.. it took like forever to surface cut a 10cm rod. but it came out not that bad.. So i guess, higher speed is the solution to this tooling thread afterall.

Hi Neo,

There I think you have it. I'd say your feeds have been too high. The radius of the tool tip is quite narrow (0.1-0.8 mm or so; this is one of the things that you can change either by buying carbide tips with different tip radius or when grinding your HSS tools). Thus your feeds should generally be in the same area; higher when roughing and lower when finishing. As a very general rule use 0.2-0.4 mm / rev feed for roughing and 0.05-0.1 mm / rev for finishing. And do turn up the spindle speed when using carbide and turning small diameter work; if you double the spindle speed you will also double your speed of working and the "low" feeds won't bother you.

Look up the correct speeds from the tables or use a surface speed calculator like Gwizard machinist's calculator; you can go lower than the suggested speeds but you should not go too low... Eventually your ears will tell you if you are doing it right   :headbang: .

The above should give you a good starting point for further experimenting. They are based on my (limited) experiences and work well on my smaller lathe with carbide tools.

Then just enjoy and experiment with feeds, speeds, depth of cut, HSS tools, a few different kinds of carbide tips etc. (The carbide tips that you have are reasonably "general purpose" and should do you fine until you decide to experiment further.)

Until you get the "mirror finish" by turning, you can always improve the surface finish with a little filing in the lathe (just beware the turning chuck!).

Cheers,


Jari

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2012, 05:47:06 AM »
At this point, our poster is armed with more than enough articles on tooling to keep him going and to make a simple tool grinder which fits onto a fairly cheap 'foreign' double ended grinder. What's it like? Pretty old but the forerunner of lots of slightly improved grinders which- cost a lot.

If he wants to do 'magical things', I also  put in drawings for two tool and cutter grinders which do not require anything more than ordinary bits of mild steel.

But let us look at 'alternatives' to going into a good tool shop or E-vil Bay. An old friend, long gone- but he gave lectures on what he used.
He used Allen keys, he used high tensile bolts, he used old files, he used broken drills, he used reground taps and broken ball race cages and even bicycle spokes. His work was of the highest exhibition standard as many would testify.

Points taken? I hope so

Offline udimet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: 00
  • Dean Smith and Grace the worlds finest.
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2012, 10:14:27 AM »
NeoTech,
                   What nose radius are you using? you mention DCMT 11T3 [11 is the edge length and T3 is the insert thickness is you nose radius either 02, 04, or 08? looking at the picture I would hazard a guess and say it is either of the 2 smaller sizes 02,or 04 if that is the case then, try using the insert with a 08 radius you should see a far better finish. Also if you are using auto feed then choose the slowest you have  [ Carbide gives a super finish at high feed rates but home machines are not really suited to them]
Also if you really want to stick with carbide then try the positive inserts used for non ferrous metals [they can be used on mild and stainless steel for finishing, but at very small depth of cut and ONLY for your finishing cuts.
                                                                                                     Regards,
                                                                                                      Udimet.

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2012, 01:13:59 PM »
Material looks torn in the pictures. If the tip is in good condition and right on center height it could be too much slack in the system or too much tool overhang. I would try another cut but with the tool pulled back in as close to the holder as possible.

Offline BillTodd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
  • Country: 00
  • Colchester Essex (where the lathes were made)
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2012, 01:28:35 PM »
looks like a chipped tip to me :(
Bill

Offline NeoTech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: se
    • Roughedge Hobbyworks
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2012, 01:45:34 PM »
Udimet, the radius is 04 according to the box it came in. I would guess that means like i should lower my carriage feed ,to a step lower than the radius of the as jiiho mentioned?

Pete, BillTodd, yes the surface is chipped/chattered, a bit rough but grooved. I could possibly had a micro crack in the tool maybe?! Cause looking at it with a magnifier dont really showing something visible that could be a problem.

I have tried a bit of diferent speeds now, maxing out the machine at 1800+ rpm with a 0.028mm/revolution overstep the surface finish is really much better, but i need to take very light cuts. I will have a go with the HSS tools as soon as my bench grinder arrives. =)

And btw,  :nrocks:
Machinery: Optimum D320x920, Optimum BF20L, Aciera F3. -- I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. http://www.roughedge.se/blogg/

Offline udimet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: 00
  • Dean Smith and Grace the worlds finest.
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2012, 02:18:44 PM »
Neo Tech,
                       Nose radius is directly linked to feedrate AND depth of cut.   Looking at the photo told me that it was a small nose radius and it was, 0.4 . It is unlikely to be micro cracking as that usually happens when the insert is suddenly cooled after becoming hot [like if you were dry cutting and then suddenly decided to cool thing down a bit ] but there was no mention of coolant in your post, so I presume you were dry cutting.   Really you should try a larger [0.8] nose radius and slow down the feedrate also flood coolant does have a big effect on the final finish  [in your case not to cool the insert but to wash away any chips that can rub on the finished surface.
 Also, DCMT inserts are not so versatile as CCMT so if you you have a SCLC R/L or a STFC R/L   then try a CCMT 06 02 08 for a small size toolholder  ie 8/10/12mm or CCMT 09 03 08 for 16mm size.                                 
                                                                                              Regards,
                                                                                               Udimet.
 

Offline Mikey

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #26 on: January 12, 2012, 03:40:54 AM »
Hey NeoTech,
I saw the pictures you posted and said, "Ooh, ooh, I know what that is!" I rushed to join this forum and raise my hand but it took a few days to get it done so I'm late but would like to agree with jiihoo and udimet. That pattern is one I know well, having done them my very own self!

Basically, you have too fast a feed rate, too slow a cutting speed, and too shallow a depth of cut for a chipbreaker insert. Feed rate for this insert should be, as jiihoo pointed out, about 1/2-2/3 the nose radius (0.02-0.026mm/rev). Cutting speed for aluminum with a carbide insert is faster than the top speed of your lathe so it needs to run at least that. DOC for a chipbreaker insert depends on the manufacturer's recommendation but in general should be about NR+0.020".

While I agree that HSS tools would work really well for you there is that little hump of learning to grind them. It isn't difficult but you still have to learn it, and while I think its a good idea I can certainly understand why you went with carbide. Lots of us do it for the same reasons, myself included once upon a time. If you stay with carbide, which is far more expensive than HSS in the long run, I agree with udimet that going to a 0.08mm NR would be a good idea and only because it will finish better for you. I am not familiar with the Sandvik series you are using but if they offer a flat top insert to fit your lathe tool instead of the chipbreaker one you are using then that will lower cutting forces and greatly aid in both roughing and finishing at lower speeds (reduced deflection).

On the other hand, HSS tools should not cost much on ebay. If you use 1/2" bits you can do with the imports until you learn to grind them well and then invest in some higher quality bits. In fact, I suggest using mild steel keystock to learn on and go to HSS only when you are confident that you can grind what you intend.

Sorry I was so late to the dance and I hope this helps. You've gotten some solid advice from the others - I would take it.

Mikey


Offline SKIPRAT

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
  • Country: gb
  • Gainsborough Lincolnshire England
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #27 on: January 13, 2012, 06:48:37 PM »
Hi There

Long long ago when i was in the apprentice training school the turning instructor gave us a talk about tool grinding he then gave us a bit of 1/2" square bright mild steel and told us to grind it up as a lathe tool.When he was satisfied we had got it right he then gave us a bit of HSS and we had to grind that up and use it in a lathe to prove it worked i wonder if that kind of stuff is still taught to apprentices these days that was a long time ago and it is like riding a bicycle once you have learnt it you don't forget it.

Cheers Paul
One Mans Junk Is Another Man's Treasure G6FOW

Offline Boucher

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #28 on: January 31, 2012, 02:23:15 PM »
The carbide tools need to be sharpened also. In fact most new carbide tools are not as sharp as one would like. A quick momentary touch to a diamond wheel can work wonders.
There is an article posted by bogstandard describing grinding a HSS flycutter that produces an outstanding surface finish. It will do the same as a turning tool. The surface finish of your part can be improved by a little filing followed by poilishing with some 320 grit paper backed by the file.
Byron Boucher
Burnet, Texas

Offline Paddy OFernichur

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: us
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2012, 08:23:09 AM »
Just a quick note on carbide to, There are hundreds and thousands of differant grades of carbide.

Each grade is specific to ONE machining condition on ONE type of material yet almost every single carbide tip listed on ebay states they are for General maching on steel.

 Ive seen inserts for nylon listed as stainless grade tips, cast iron as steel tips. Unless you have been tought the carbide companies grading system you are buying grades of carbide that are utter usless to you.

Actually, I'll disagree with the part in bold. There are many good inserts out there which can work in a wide range of applications. Perhaps you just haven't found any yet, but they do exist. Is there ONE insert size, shape, grade and coating that can work in 90% of all applications? Not even close, but there are some very useful, almost "universal"  inserts out there.

Offline Jonny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #30 on: February 01, 2012, 04:11:11 PM »
Looks like movement or vibration to me cutter digging in.
Try dragging the cutter, if a lot better you know where to look.

These types of bull nose were the only things apart from a sharp point that worked in my ML7 20 yr ago, that site 150698711080

Offline Fergus OMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Country: england
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2012, 03:48:31 AM »
Gentlemen,

                    May I make a plea? The poster is a novice and English is certainly not his first language and he has, like many  of us, no professional training and is using a hobby lathe. Can we attempt to concentrate on the issue and not involve him in the perplexities and issues of what is production engineering?

As far as I see it, all that he needs is a set of FOUR tools in a turret ( or 4 tools in a quick change holder) to do a simple turning operation- in stainless steel.

Can someone bring himself to address the specific problem- using carbide tools which seem- who knows why, to be his choice?

At some point, he is going to discover that he is going to have to use hss if only to drill holes-- and they do get blunt. However, that is not yet the issue!


Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: Turning and Surface finishing - fail.
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2012, 02:49:50 PM »
I think he will have used some HSS by now :)