Home Base > Introductions |
hi from notts |
<< < (3/3) |
andyf:
--- Quote from: gazz on February 21, 2011, 09:44:26 PM ---Now youve thrown a spanner in the works, i was all set to get a sieg C3, the real bull one looks a little better, larger motor, but not much info on it to be honnest... i.e. does it still use a 2 speed gearbox and the motor is a brushed DC motor, --- End quote --- Hi Gazz, The Real Bull is the same design as the Sieg (both clones of some long-forgotten Russian machine, it is said). There are detail differences; the saddle is square on one and H shaped on the other, the RB has a nut on the end of the leadscrew to adjust its end float (the threaded stub which the nut goes on gives a good start towards fitting a handwheel on the leadscrew) and the RB has a sprinkling of oil ports to help with lubricating the leadscrew and saddle. The RB is available with a 4" spindle flange to take the larger chuck. The 2-speed gearbox is exactly the same. As an example of the general interchangeability of parts, a pal of mine has fitted a 4" RB spindle bought from Amadeal to his Seig C3: http://mikesworkshop.weebly.com/headstock-upgrade.html Choices, choices.... Andy |
Gazz292:
I can see the bigger chuck is a deffinate advantage, and the real bull has a more powerfull motor, but apeers to not have a cam lock tail stock, tho it's pretty easy to modify i guess... something to do on the lathe when i get it, along with making up metal wheels to replace the plastic ones on the tailstock and saddle. I'm now leaning heavily towards the real bull (naff name, but i have a vinyl cutter, so can soon change it to something even naffer :dremel: Need to find a few more things to sell on ebay (anyone need any halstead finest gold boiler bits, got heat exchangers, valves, pump, fans etc :) then measure the smart and see if it'll fit in the boot, or i need to take the trailer, and a trip to laandahhhn is in order me thinks. I see he does a quick change tool holder for 33 quid or so, is it any good? it dosent look like the ones i see for double that money, i.e. no big lever sticking out to operate the piston to lock the holders in place. |
andyf:
The tailstock should be easy to modify, Gazz. If you look at Arc Euro's pic of the C3, theirs seems to be basically the same casting, but with a lever and a cam arrangement to pull up a plate under the bedways, hence clamping the tailstock. Dunno about the QCTP. I have a cheapo one of a different design, which isn't perfect but much better than no QCTP at all. You need to check the availability of extra toolholders; if my experience is anything to go by, you will need at least 10. I make my own, but this would be difficult without a milling machine. There are DIY QCTPs which can be made entirely on the lathe. Andy |
Navigation |
Message Index |
Previous page |