Going back to the original question "Analog or Digital for a DTI?"
I think for most of us its a question of what you're going to use it for.
In (very general terms) an Indicator is used to Indicate - not measure. Its use is to show if something is varying, and possibly by how much. The absolute doesn't tend to matter - its which way it varies, and trends. A moving needle is ideal to see relative jumps. If you're clocking or centring something, a graphical indication is probably hundreds of times easier to use than a pure pure digital one - imagine trying to centre something with a pure digital indicator, watching and trying to read each value and then if its higher, is it more the the biggest I've seen so far

On the other hand, if you're making absolute measurements (this needs to be 87.46 mm long), or a height gauge, or a CNC tool length gauge, then I'm quite comfortable using a digital instrument. And, once I fitted my manual mill with digital DROs, rather than squinting at dials and trying to count reliably, and still watch the work - absolutely no contest!
Its quite noticeable in the professional broadcast market, which is one of the greatest embracers of digital technology, that key indicators, such as sound levels, are still done with either moving coil meters or bar graphs (and an alarm if you're approaching broadcast maxima). One of the reasons I think is that you can monitor them with peripheral vision rather than have to make them your prime focus.
So, as they say, horses for course .....
Dave